Navin Chaudhary vs Mani Lal Tanti and others — 24142/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRBE110004632024
Filing Number
24142/2024
Filing Date
23-Jul-2025
Registration No
24142/2024
Registration Date
18-May-2024
Court
CJM Div. Manjhaul
Judge
5-Acjm
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
MANJHAUL
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Navin Chaudhary
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mani Lal Tanti and others
-
2.Gulashan kumar Tanti
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy JudgementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manjhol (Begusarai) acquitted both accused Mangilal Tanti and Gulshan Kumar Tanti of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 324, 504, and 506/34, while granting them benefit of doubt on Section 324 charges. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, noting inadequate medical and investigative evidence, and ruled that the injuries appeared minor and resulted from a scuffle rather than deliberate assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Acjm
-
06-Mar-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Acjm
-
27-Feb-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Acjm
-
25-Feb-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Acjm
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Acjm
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence
Acjm
-
29-Jan-2026
Appearence
Acjm
-
24-Jan-2026
Appearence
Acjm
-
20-Jan-2026
Appearence
Acjm
-
17-Jan-2026
Appearence
Acjm
-
12-Jan-2026
Appearence
Acjm
-
03-Jan-2026
Appearence
Acjm
-
03-Nov-2025
Appearence
Acjm
-
22-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 24142/2024
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manjhol (Begusarai) acquitted both accused Mangilal Tanti and Gulshan Kumar Tanti of charges under IPC Sections 341, 323, 324, 504, and 506/34, while granting them benefit of doubt on Section 324 charges. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, noting inadequate medical and investigative evidence, and ruled that the injuries appeared minor and resulted from a scuffle rather than deliberate assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts