BATORAN SAH vs JAGO DEVI Advocate - PP — 172/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 447,323,354,379,427,504,34. Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Appearence Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CRI. CASE

CNR: BRBE110002812017

Filing Number

172/2017

Filing Date

08-Oct-2018

Registration No

172/2017

Registration Date

08-Feb-2021

Court

CJM Div. Manjhaul

Judge

8-Judicial Magistrate -I Class

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

90

Police Station

CHERIYABARIYAR PUR

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 447,323,354,379,427,504,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BATORAN SAH

    Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAGO DEVI Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

  2. 2.GANESH SAH

  3. 3.MARNI DEVI

  4. 4.GURIYA DEVI

  5. 5.DABAR SAH

  6. 6.BADRI NARAYAN SAH

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  5. 22-Dec-2025

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  6. 02-Dec-2025

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  7. 07-Nov-2025

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  8. 06-Nov-2025

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  9. 26-Sep-2025

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  10. 29-Aug-2025

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  11. 12-Aug-2025

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  12. 24-Jul-2025

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  13. 10-Jun-2025

    Charge

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  14. 07-May-2025

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  15. 28-Mar-2025

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  16. 03-Mar-2025

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  17. 29-Jan-2025

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  18. 24-Dec-2024

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  19. 07-Oct-2024

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  20. 31-Jul-2024

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  21. 04-Jun-2024

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  22. 08-Apr-2024

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  23. 12-Feb-2024

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  24. 15-Dec-2023

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  25. 02-Nov-2023

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  26. 24-Aug-2023

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  27. 07-Jul-2023

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  28. 23-May-2023

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  29. 05-Apr-2023

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  30. 25-Feb-2023

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  31. 20-Jan-2023

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  32. 02-Dec-2022

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  33. 02-Nov-2022

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  34. 08-Sep-2022

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  35. 06-Aug-2022

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  36. 19-Jul-2022

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  37. 16-Jun-2022

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  38. 10-May-2022

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  39. 31-Mar-2022

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  40. 24-Feb-2022

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  41. 17-Jan-2022

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  42. 18-Dec-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  43. 04-Dec-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  44. 16-Nov-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  45. 01-Oct-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  46. 08-Sep-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  47. 21-Aug-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  48. 07-Aug-2021

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary Bail was granted to the four accused (Jaggo Devi, Marni Devi, Gudiya Devi, and Dabar Shah Urf Karan Kumar) on the condition of furnishing a bond of Rs. 5,000 with a surety. The court found that while charges under sections 447, 341, 379, 427, 504, and 506 IPC were bailable (except section 379), it was the first appearance of the accused, and they were cooperative. Subsequently, the requisitioned bond amount was filed and the accused were released from judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  49. 07-Aug-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  50. 17-Jul-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  51. 28-Jun-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  52. 04-Jun-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  53. 06-May-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  54. 13-Apr-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  55. 22-Mar-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  56. 01-Mar-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  57. 01-Feb-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  58. 20-Jan-2021

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  59. 23-Dec-2020

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  60. 25-Nov-2020

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  61. 14-Oct-2020

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  62. 17-Sep-2020

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  63. 13-Aug-2020

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  64. 03-Jul-2020

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  65. 04-Jun-2020

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  66. 06-May-2020

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  67. 31-Mar-2020

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  68. 05-Mar-2020

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  69. 11-Feb-2020

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  70. 18-Jan-2020

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  71. 16-Dec-2019

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  72. 14-Dec-2019

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  73. 19-Nov-2019

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  74. 15-Oct-2019

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  75. 04-Sep-2019

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  76. 14-Aug-2019

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  77. 23-Jul-2019

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  78. 02-Jul-2019

    Appearence

    Judicial Magistrate -I Class

  79. 07-May-2019

    Appearence

    Acjm

  80. 03-Apr-2019

    Appearence

    Acjm

  81. 10-Jan-2019

    Appearence

  82. 09-Oct-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  83. 08-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 172/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Bail was granted to the four accused (Jaggo Devi, Marni Devi, Gudiya Devi, and Dabar Shah Urf Karan Kumar) on the condition of furnishing a bond of Rs. 5,000 with a surety. The court found that while charges under sections 447, 341, 379, 427, 504, and 506 IPC were bailable (except section 379), it was the first appearance of the accused, and they were cooperative. Subsequently, the requisitioned bond amount was filed and the accused were released from judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case