RADHA DEVI vs RANJEET MAHTO — 207/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,325,504,506,379,354(B),34. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
CRI. CASE
CNR: BRBE110002802020
Filing Number
279/2020
Filing Date
27-Aug-2020
Registration No
207/2020
Registration Date
27-Aug-2020
Court
CJM Div. Manjhaul
Judge
14-Judicial Magistrate -I Class
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
139
Police Station
CHERIYABARIYAR PUR
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RADHA DEVI
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RANJEET MAHTO
-
2.SINKU KUMAR
-
3.TINKU KUMAR
-
4.SHANKAR MAHTO
-
5.GAURI SHANKAR MAHTO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy JudgementView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Manjhaul, Begusarai acquitted all five accused persons—Ranjeet Mahto, Tinku Kumar, Shankar Mahto, Gauri Shankar Mahto, and Shinku Mahto—of charges under IPC sections 323, 341, 325, 379, 354(B), 504, and 506/34. The court found the prosecution failed to produce any evidence despite multiple opportunities, and since the burden of proof lies with the prosecution in criminal trials, the accused were entitled to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate -I Class
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate -I Class
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate -I Class
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate -I Class
-
06-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate -I Class
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate -I Class
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate -I Class
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate -I Class
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate -I Class
-
28-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate -I Class
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate -I Class
-
12-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate -I Class
-
19-May-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate -I Class
-
19-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate -I Class
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate -I Class
-
14-Feb-2025
Police Paper
Acjm
-
13-Jan-2025
Police Paper
Acjm
-
03-Dec-2024
Police Paper
Acjm
-
25-Sep-2024
Police Paper
Acjm
-
19-Aug-2024
Police Paper
Acjm
-
01-Jun-2024
Police Paper
Acjm
-
07-Mar-2024
Hearing
Acjm
-
07-Dec-2023
Hearing
Acjm
-
06-Oct-2023
Hearing
Acjm
-
16-Aug-2023
Hearing
Acjm
-
03-Jul-2023
Hearing
Acjm
-
30-May-2023
Hearing
Acjm
-
27-Apr-2023
Hearing
Acjm
-
01-Apr-2023
Hearing
Acjm
-
13-Mar-2023
Hearing
Acjm
-
07-Feb-2023
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
04-Jan-2023
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
14-Nov-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
10-Oct-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
01-Sep-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
23-Jul-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
24-Jun-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
27-May-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
18-Apr-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
04-Mar-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
24-Jan-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
21-Dec-2021
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
29-Oct-2021
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
06-Sep-2021
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
27-Jul-2021
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
07-Jun-2021
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
22-Apr-2021
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
27-Feb-2021
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
18-Jan-2021
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
24-Nov-2020
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
Acjm
-
17-Sep-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Aug-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 207/2020
The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Manjhaul, Begusarai acquitted all five accused persons—Ranjeet Mahto, Tinku Kumar, Shankar Mahto, Gauri Shankar Mahto, and Shinku Mahto—of charges under IPC sections 323, 341, 325, 379, 354(B), 504, and 506/34. The court found the prosecution failed to produce any evidence despite multiple opportunities, and since the burden of proof lies with the prosecution in criminal trials, the accused were entitled to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts