PREMA DEVI vs MANI TANTI — 26/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 313,341,354B,379,427/34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Case Complaint (P)

CNR: BRBE110000352023

Filing Number

36/2023

Filing Date

06-Feb-2023

Registration No

26/2023

Registration Date

06-Feb-2023

Court

CJM Div. Manjhaul

Judge

5-Acjm

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 313,341,354B,379,427/34
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PREMA DEVI

    Adv. GANGA PRASAD SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANI TANTI

  2. 2.GULSHAN TANTI

  3. 3.SIYARAM TANTI

  4. 4.SANTOSH TANTI

  5. 5.BHAGWAN DEVI ANT OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy JudgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Manjhaul, Begusarai acquitted five accused persons (Mani Tanti, Gulshan Tanti, Siyaram Tanti, Santosh Tanti, and Bhagwati Devi) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 342, 379, 448, and the Dowry Prohibition Act, citing insufficient evidence. The court found that the accused were relatives of the complainant (Prema Devi's husband) and that the alleged assault arose from a land dispute that was subsequently settled amicably between the parties, with no credible corroborating evidence proving the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Acjm

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Acjm

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Acjm

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Acjm

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Acjm

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Acjm

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Acjm

  10. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Acjm

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Acjm

  12. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Acjm

  13. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Acjm

  14. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Acjm

  15. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Acjm

  16. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Acjm

  17. 02-Jun-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Acjm

  18. 13-May-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Acjm

  19. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Acjm

  20. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Acjm

  21. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Acjm

  22. 22-Jan-2025

    Evidence Before Charge

    Acjm

  23. 19-Dec-2024

    Charge

    Acjm

  24. 10-Dec-2024

    Charge

    Acjm

  25. 30-Sep-2024

    Appearence

    Acjm

  26. 24-Jul-2024

    Appearence

    Acjm

  27. 06-Jul-2024

    Appearence

    Acjm

  28. 07-Jun-2024

    Appearence

    Acjm

  29. 17-May-2024

    Appearence

    Acjm

  30. 18-Apr-2024

    Appearence

    Acjm

  31. 04-Apr-2024

    Appearence

    Acjm

  32. 11-Mar-2024

    Appearence

    Acjm

  33. 08-Mar-2024

    Appearence

    Acjm

  34. 08-Dec-2023

    Appearence

    Acjm

  35. 03-Nov-2023

    Appearence

    Acjm

  36. 29-Sep-2023

    Appearence

    Acjm

  37. 31-Aug-2023

    Appearence

    Acjm

  38. 11-Aug-2023

    Appearence

    Acjm

  39. 28-Jul-2023

    Appearence

    Acjm

  40. 12-Jul-2023

    Appearence

    Acjm

  41. 26-Jun-2023

    Appearence

    Acjm

  42. 30-May-2023

    Appearence

    Acjm

  43. 17-May-2023

    Order

    Acjm

  44. 11-May-2023

    Hearing

    Acjm

  45. 03-May-2023

    Hearing

    Acjm

  46. 24-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    Acjm

  47. 15-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    Acjm

  48. 06-Apr-2023

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    Acjm

  49. 27-Mar-2023

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    Acjm

  50. 20-Feb-2023

    Soleman Affirmation (S.a)

    Acjm

  51. 10-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 06-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Manjhaul, Begusarai acquitted five accused persons (Mani Tanti, Gulshan Tanti, Siyaram Tanti, Santosh Tanti, and Bhagwati Devi) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 342, 379, 448, and the Dowry Prohibition Act, citing insufficient evidence. The court found that the accused were relatives of the complainant (Prema Devi's husband) and that the alleged assault arose from a land dispute that was subsequently settled amicably between the parties, with no credible corroborating evidence proving the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case