PREMA DEVI vs MANI TANTI — 26/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 313,341,354B,379,427/34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
Cr. Case Complaint (P)
CNR: BRBE110000352023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
36/2023
Filing Date
06-02-2023
Registration No
26/2023
Registration Date
06-02-2023
Court
CJM Div. Manjhaul
Judge
5-ACJM
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PREMA DEVI
Adv. GANGA PRASAD SINHA
Respondent(s)
MANI TANTI
GULSHAN TANTI
SIYARAM TANTI
SANTOSH TANTI
BHAGWAN DEVI ANT OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: 5-ACJM
Disposed
ARGUMENTS
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 27-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 25-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 16-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Manjhaul, Begusarai acquitted five accused persons (Mani Tanti, Gulshan Tanti, Siyaram Tanti, Santosh Tanti, and Bhagwati Devi) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 342, 379, 448, and the Dowry Prohibition Act, citing insufficient evidence. The court found that the accused were relatives of the complainant (Prema Devi's husband) and that the alleged assault arose from a land dispute that was subsequently settled amicably between the parties, with no credible corroborating evidence proving the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Manjhaul, Begusarai acquitted five accused persons (Mani Tanti, Gulshan Tanti, Siyaram Tanti, Santosh Tanti, and Bhagwati Devi) of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 342, 379, 448, and the Dowry Prohibition Act, citing insufficient evidence. The court found that the accused were relatives of the complainant (Prema Devi's husband) and that the alleged assault arose from a land dispute that was subsequently settled amicably between the parties, with no credible corroborating evidence proving the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts