MD ISRAFIL vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 259/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,304,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION

CNR: BRBE100003512025

Filing Number

259/2025

Filing Date

15-Nov-2025

Registration No

259/2025

Registration Date

09-Dec-2025

Court

DJ Div. Manjhaul

Judge

2-Addl. District And Session Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,304,504,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD ISRAFIL

  2. 2.ANJUM ARA

  3. 3.ANISHA KHATUN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Order

    The Additional Sessions Judge set aside the lower court's cognizance order dated 24.12.2020 that charged the revisionists under IPC sections 341, 304, and 504/34, finding that section 304 (culpable homicide) was wrongly applied since no murder occurred in the case. The court directed the appellants to file an application before the lower court to rectify the cognizance order, which shall be passed afresh in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  5. 07-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  6. 23-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 259/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge set aside the lower court's cognizance order dated 24.12.2020 that charged the revisionists under IPC sections 341, 304, and 504/34, finding that section 304 (culpable homicide) was wrongly applied since no murder occurred in the case. The court directed the appellants to file an application before the lower court to rectify the cognizance order, which shall be passed afresh in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case