CHANDRAREKHA DEVI vs RAMESH YADAV — 464/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,354B,308,379,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRBE100001852024

Filing Number

464/2024

Filing Date

05-Jul-2024

Registration No

464/2024

Registration Date

15-May-2024

Court

DJ Div. Manjhaul

Judge

2-Addl. District And Session Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

167

Police Station

KHODAWANDPUR

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,354B,308,379,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRAREKHA DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH YADAV

  2. 2.SURESH YADAV

  3. 3.RABINDRA KUMAR YADAV

  4. 4.NITISH KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy JudgementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Manjhaul acquitted all four accused persons (Ravindra Kumar Yadav, Nitish Kumar, Ramesh Yadav, and Suresh Yadav) of charges under IPC sections 308/34, 323/34, 341/34, 354D/34, 379/34, 504/34, and 506/34. The court found that the prosecution witnesses, despite supporting the case during examination-in-chief, contradicted themselves during cross-examination by stating there was a huge crowd and they could not identify who actually assaulted them or confirm that any theft occurred. The judge concluded the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the witness testimony was neither cogent nor reliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  11. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  12. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  13. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  14. 24-May-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  15. 07-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  16. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  17. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  18. 13-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  19. 10-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  20. 30-Aug-2024

    Charge

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  21. 02-Aug-2024

    Charge

    Addl. District And Session Judge

  22. 12-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 05-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 464/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Manjhaul acquitted all four accused persons (Ravindra Kumar Yadav, Nitish Kumar, Ramesh Yadav, and Suresh Yadav) of charges under IPC sections 308/34, 323/34, 341/34, 354D/34, 379/34, 504/34, and 506/34. The court found that the prosecution witnesses, despite supporting the case during examination-in-chief, contradicted themselves during cross-examination by stating there was a huge crowd and they could not identify who actually assaulted them or confirm that any theft occurred. The judge concluded the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the witness testimony was neither cogent nor reliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case