DHARAM KUMAR ALIAS DHARAMBEER KUMARE RAI vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 640/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 02nd May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBE010027472026
e-Filing Number
23-03-2026
Filing Number
2567/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
640/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Begusarai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
02-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 11-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
78
Police Station
BAKHARI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHARAM KUMAR ALIAS DHARAMBEER KUMARE RAI
Adv. MD. MANZOOR ALAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
Copy of Order
Case 640/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai rejected Dharam Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in an NDPS Act Section 21(b) case. The court found that 70 liters of BLUREX-T Triprolidine Hydrochloride & Codeine Phosphate Syrup were recovered from the petitioner's room, corroborated by witness statements in the case diary. The court held that given the gravity of allegations, recovery of contraband, ongoing investigation, and the petitioner's active involvement in the illegal drug trade, custodial interrogation was necessary, making anticipatory bail inappropriate at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 640/2026
Case 640/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai rejected Dharam Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in an NDPS Act Section 21(b) case. The court found that 70 liters of BLUREX-T Triprolidine Hydrochloride & Codeine Phosphate Syrup were recovered from the petitioner's room, corroborated by witness statements in the case diary. The court held that given the gravity of allegations, recovery of contraband, ongoing investigation, and the petitioner's active involvement in the illegal drug trade, custodial interrogation was necessary, making anticipatory bail inappropriate at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts