ANKIT KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 626/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBE010027132026

e-Filing Number

23-03-2026

Filing Number

2533/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

626/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Begusarai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 11-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

232

Police Station

SAHEBPUR KAMAL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANKIT KUMAR

    Adv. CHANDRAPRAKASH PODDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of Order

    Case Summary: Ankit Kumar v. The State of Bihar (626/2026) The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai rejected Ankit Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a firearms incident where he allegedly participated in a 25-round shooting that injured the informant's husband. The court found credible evidence supporting the charges, including the informant's restatement and witness testimony in the case diary, combined with a medical report confirming gunpowder-related firearm injury. The petitioner's prior criminal antecedent and the similarity to co-accused cases (whose bail applications were already rejected) further weighed against granting relief, though the court directed him to surrender and apply for regular bail before the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 626/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ankit Kumar v. The State of Bihar (626/2026) The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai rejected Ankit Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a firearms incident where he allegedly participated in a 25-round shooting that injured the informant's husband. The court found credible evidence supporting the charges, including the informant's restatement and witness testimony in the case diary, combined with a medical report confirming gunpowder-related firearm injury. The petitioner's prior criminal antecedent and the similarity to co-accused cases (whose bail applications were already rejected) further weighed against granting relief, though the court directed him to surrender and apply for regular bail before the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case