ANOJ KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 495/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBE010022832026

Filing Number

2137/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

495/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Begusarai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

558

Police Station

BALIA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANOJ KUMAR

    Adv. RAJESH RANJAN DASS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai granted anticipatory bail to Anoj Kumar in a case involving charges of extortion, criminal intimidation, and illegal firearms possession. The court found no specific allegation against the petitioner for assault, noted the absence of injury to the informant, and observed a suspicious 7-day delay in filing the FIR, alongside the fact that co-accused had already received similar bail. The petitioner was released on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 495/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai granted anticipatory bail to Anoj Kumar in a case involving charges of extortion, criminal intimidation, and illegal firearms possession. The court found no specific allegation against the petitioner for assault, noted the absence of injury to the informant, and observed a suspicious 7-day delay in filing the FIR, alongside the fact that co-accused had already received similar bail. The petitioner was released on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case