CHUNCHUN KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 297/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
CRI. BAIL APPLN
CNR: BRBE010019972026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
1864/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
297/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Begusarai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
98
Police Station
NAYAGAON
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHUNCHUN KUMAR
Adv. RAHUL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai granted bail to both accused Chunchun Kumar and Prince Kumar in a theft case involving Rs. 10,000 and gold ornaments. The court found that the mandatory Test Identification Parade under Section 103 of BNSS was not conducted, the charge-sheet was already submitted with no risk of evidence tampering, and the accused had been in custody for over three months. The petitioners were released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 each and two sureties, subject to conditions including having a relative as surety and not committing similar offences pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 297/2026
The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai granted bail to both accused Chunchun Kumar and Prince Kumar in a theft case involving Rs. 10,000 and gold ornaments. The court found that the mandatory Test Identification Parade under Section 103 of BNSS was not conducted, the charge-sheet was already submitted with no risk of evidence tampering, and the accused had been in custody for over three months. The petitioners were released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 each and two sureties, subject to conditions including having a relative as surety and not committing similar offences pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts