CHUNCHUN KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 297/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
CRI. BAIL APPLN
CNR: BRBE010019972026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
1864/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
297/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Begusarai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
98
Police Station
NAYAGAON
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHUNCHUN KUMAR
Adv. RAHUL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai granted bail to both accused Chunchun Kumar and Prince Kumar in a theft case involving Rs. 10,000 and gold ornaments. The court found that the mandatory Test Identification Parade under Section 103 of BNSS was not conducted, the charge-sheet was already submitted with no risk of evidence tampering, and the accused had been in custody for over three months. The petitioners were released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 each and two sureties, subject to conditions including having a relative as surety and not committing similar offences pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai granted bail to both accused Chunchun Kumar and Prince Kumar in a theft case involving Rs. 10,000 and gold ornaments. The court found that the mandatory Test Identification Parade under Section 103 of BNSS was not conducted, the charge-sheet was already submitted with no risk of evidence tampering, and the accused had been in custody for over three months. The petitioners were released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 each and two sureties, subject to conditions including having a relative as surety and not committing similar offences pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts