GOPAL PASWAN vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 426/2026

Case under Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Section 191(1),126(2),115,117(2),109(1),308(2),303(2),351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBE010019472026

e-Filing Number

21-02-2026

Filing Number

1815/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

426/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Begusarai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

379

Police Station

BEGUSARAI MUFASSIL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Section 191(1),126(2),115,117(2),109(1),308(2),303(2),351(2)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOPAL PASWAN

    Adv. Chandramohan Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai granted anticipatory bail to Gopal Paswan in a case involving alleged assault and extortion. The court found that while the petitioner was accused of group assault, there was no specific allegation against him personally, injuries were simple in nature, and he had no criminal antecedent, making bail appropriate. He was released on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties under standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 426/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai granted anticipatory bail to Gopal Paswan in a case involving alleged assault and extortion. The court found that while the petitioner was accused of group assault, there was no specific allegation against him personally, injuries were simple in nature, and he had no criminal antecedent, making bail appropriate. He was released on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties under standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case