RAM PUKAR MAHTO vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 8/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Mislaneous

CNR: BRBE010019192026

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

1793/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Begusarai

Judge

80-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-XI

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

156

Police Station

BEGUSARAI TOWN

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM PUKAR MAHTO

    Adv. VIVEK KUMAR SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-XI, Begusarai allowed Ram Pukar Mahto's petition to extend his anticipatory bail surrender deadline by seven additional days from receipt of the order. The petitioner had been granted anticipatory bail on 06.01.2026 with a 40-day surrender period but faced delays in complying with court-directed electricity board installment deposits due to administrative delays, which the court found to be bona fide reasons warranting extension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-XI

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Additional Sessions Judge-XI, Begusarai allowed Ram Pukar Mahto's petition to extend his anticipatory bail surrender deadline by seven additional days from receipt of the order. The petitioner had been granted anticipatory bail on 06.01.2026 with a 40-day surrender period but faced delays in complying with court-directed electricity board installment deposits due to administrative delays, which the court found to be bona fide reasons warranting extension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case