VIKASH PASWAN vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 388/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBE010017692026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
1661/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
388/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Begusarai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
379
Police Station
BEGUSARAI MUFASSIL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIKASH PASWAN
Adv. MD. MANZOOR ALAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Court Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Vikash Paswan, Sachin Kumar, Zeera Devi, and Aman Kumar) accused of assault, extortion, and theft. The court found that most offences were bailable, injuries were predominantly simple in nature, co-accused received similar bail, and petitioners had no criminal antecedents. They were released on Rs 10,000 bail bond with two sureties each, subject to conditions including having a close relative as surety and undertaking not to commit similar offences during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 388/2026
Court Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners (Vikash Paswan, Sachin Kumar, Zeera Devi, and Aman Kumar) accused of assault, extortion, and theft. The court found that most offences were bailable, injuries were predominantly simple in nature, co-accused received similar bail, and petitioners had no criminal antecedents. They were released on Rs 10,000 bail bond with two sureties each, subject to conditions including having a close relative as surety and undertaking not to commit similar offences during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts