MD RUSTAM vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 323/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,147,323,504,493. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBE010015252026

e-Filing Number

10-02-2026

Filing Number

1437/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

323/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Begusarai

Judge

4-District and Addl. Session Judge-III

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

30

Police Station

CHERIYABARIYAR PUR

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 376,147,323,504,493

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD RUSTAM

    Adv. MD SAKIL AHMED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The court granted pre-arrest bail to Md. Sarfaraz under Section 482 BNSS in a rape case (Cheria Bariyarpur P.S. Case No-30/2022) involving offences under IPC Sections 376, 147, 323, 504, and 493. The court found that allegations against the petitioner were general and non-specific, and his role was not clearly defined, warranting bail with Rs. 10,000 bond and sureties, conditional on his surrender within 28 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Session Judge-III

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Session Judge-III

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Session Judge-III

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 323/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted pre-arrest bail to Md. Sarfaraz under Section 482 BNSS in a rape case (Cheria Bariyarpur P.S. Case No-30/2022) involving offences under IPC Sections 376, 147, 323, 504, and 493. The court found that allegations against the petitioner were general and non-specific, and his role was not clearly defined, warranting bail with Rs. 10,000 bond and sureties, conditional on his surrender within 28 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case