GAUTAM KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 210/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(1),126(2),115(2),117(2),109(1),308(2),303(2),351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
CRI. BAIL APPLN
CNR: BRBE010013812026
e-Filing Number
07-02-2026
Filing Number
1294/2026
Filing Date
07-02-2026
Registration No
210/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Begusarai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
379
Police Station
BEGUSARAI MUFASSIL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GAUTAM KUMAR
Adv. SUDHIR KUMAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 20-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai granted bail to Gautam Kumar in a case involving alleged rioting, extortion, and assault. The court found that while the petitioner was charged along with others for attacking an informant and his family, there was no specific allegation of assault against him personally, he had no criminal antecedents, sustained injuries were simple in nature, and he had already served significant custody since January 25, 2026. He was released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including that one surety be a close relative and that he not commit similar offences during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai granted bail to Gautam Kumar in a case involving alleged rioting, extortion, and assault. The court found that while the petitioner was charged along with others for attacking an informant and his family, there was no specific allegation of assault against him personally, he had no criminal antecedents, sustained injuries were simple in nature, and he had already served significant custody since January 25, 2026. He was released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including that one surety be a close relative and that he not commit similar offences during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts