mahendra chaoudhary vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 204/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,3(5),. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 01st April 2026.
CRI. BAIL APPLN
CNR: BRBE010013482026
e-Filing Number
07-02-2026
Filing Number
1262/2026
Filing Date
07-02-2026
Registration No
204/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Begusarai
Judge
3-District and Addl. Session Judge-I
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
441
Police Station
TEGHRA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
mahendra chaoudhary
Adv. AKIL AHMAD
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District and Addl. Session Judge-I
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 19-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court rejected the bail petition of Mahendra Choudhary and Raj Kumar Choudhary, who are accused of assaulting a rickshaw puller with lethal weapons, causing grievous injuries including a fractured rib. The judge found sufficient evidence in the form of direct allegations, medical reports showing two grievous injuries to vital body parts, and corroborating witness statements and the injured person's own statement, concluding the case against the accused is substantiated and the seriousness of the offence warrants continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the bail petition of Mahendra Choudhary and Raj Kumar Choudhary, who are accused of assaulting a rickshaw puller with lethal weapons, causing grievous injuries including a fractured rib. The judge found sufficient evidence in the form of direct allegations, medical reports showing two grievous injuries to vital body parts, and corroborating witness statements and the injured person's own statement, concluding the case against the accused is substantiated and the seriousness of the offence warrants continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts