AMIT KUMAR PASWAN vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 283/2026
Case under Bihar Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Rules,1985 Section 8(C),20,21(C),29. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 01st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBE010013042026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
1222/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
283/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Begusarai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
42
Police Station
BALIA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMIT KUMAR PASWAN
Adv. MUKESH KUMAR SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Amit Kumar Paswan, accused under the NDPS Act for possession of 21.50 litres of Codeine Syrup (commercial quantity) recovered from his house. The court found the prosecution case credible, noting the petitioner deliberately suppressed one criminal antecedent, and determined that the ongoing investigation and gravity of allegations precluded bail at this stage. The petitioner was directed to surrender and seek regular bail before the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 283/2026
The Principal Sessions Judge, Begusarai rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Amit Kumar Paswan, accused under the NDPS Act for possession of 21.50 litres of Codeine Syrup (commercial quantity) recovered from his house. The court found the prosecution case credible, noting the petitioner deliberately suppressed one criminal antecedent, and determined that the ongoing investigation and gravity of allegations precluded bail at this stage. The petitioner was directed to surrender and seek regular bail before the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts