NIKHIL KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 172/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,61(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBE010007522026
e-Filing Number
20-01-2026
Filing Number
697/2026
Filing Date
21-01-2026
Registration No
172/2026
Registration Date
21-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Begusarai
Judge
4-District and Addl. Session Judge-III
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
163
Police Station
MATIHANI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NIKHIL KUMAR
Adv. BALRAM SINGH
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District and Addl. Session Judge-III
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 09-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Nikhil Kumar under Section 482 BNSS in a case involving alleged abduction and subsequent suicide of a girl. Although the mobile number used to contact the deceased was not definitively linked to the petitioner, the court found his name prominently featured among the accused abductors and deemed custodial interrogation necessary, making anticipatory bail imprudent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Nikhil Kumar under Section 482 BNSS in a case involving alleged abduction and subsequent suicide of a girl. Although the mobile number used to contact the deceased was not definitively linked to the petitioner, the court found his name prominently featured among the accused abductors and deemed custodial interrogation necessary, making anticipatory bail imprudent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts