STATE OF BIHAR vs RAM PAWESH SINGH — 10/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section N. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

TITLE APPEAL

CNR: BRBA010068142025

e-Filing Number

18-12-2025

Filing Number

572/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Registration No

10/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Court

DJ Div. Banka

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section N

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

    Adv. Amber Mukharjee

  2. 2.DFO

  3. 3.DEO

  4. 4.BEO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAM PAWESH SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    UncontestedView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Principal District Judge of Banka allowed the appeal and set aside the lower court's judgment, finding that the defendants (State of Bihar and its departments) were not properly served with summons before the ex-parte decision. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove his case on merits, as his documentary evidence (land receipts and consolidation officer orders) did not establish ownership, and critically, the plaintiff's own plaint admitted his father had donated the land to the defendants, making a possession suit unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    Appearence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal District Judge of Banka allowed the appeal and set aside the lower court's judgment, finding that the defendants (State of Bihar and its departments) were not properly served with summons before the ex-parte decision. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove his case on merits, as his documentary evidence (land receipts and consolidation officer orders) did not establish ownership, and critically, the plaintiff's own plaint admitted his father had donated the land to the defendants, making a possession suit unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case