CHANDRADEO DAS vs GUDIYA DEVI — 148/2025
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 25th March 2026.
MATRIMONIAL CASE
CNR: BRBA010024572025
e-Filing Number
17-06-2025
Filing Number
269/2025
Filing Date
17-Jun-2025
Registration No
148/2025
Registration Date
17-Jun-2025
Court
DJ Div. Banka
Judge
16-Principal Judge, Family Court
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANDRADEO DAS
Adv. RAVI SHANKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.GUDIYA DEVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
UncontestedView PDF
The Family Court, Banka dismissed Matrimonial Case No. 148/2025 filed by Chandradeo Das under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act on 25/03/2026. The petitioner failed to appear before the court repeatedly since 19/07/2025 despite multiple adjournments, leading the court to conclude he had no genuine interest in the case and dismiss the petition for continued non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
09-Feb-2026
addmission
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
16-Dec-2025
addmission
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
16-Oct-2025
addmission
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
18-Sep-2025
addmission
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
21-Aug-2025
addmission
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
29-Jul-2025
addmission
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
19-Jul-2025
Report
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
07-Jul-2025
Report
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
18-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 148/2025
The Family Court, Banka dismissed Matrimonial Case No. 148/2025 filed by Chandradeo Das under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act on 25/03/2026. The petitioner failed to appear before the court repeatedly since 19/07/2025 despite multiple adjournments, leading the court to conclude he had no genuine interest in the case and dismiss the petition for continued non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts