PANKAJ KUMAR CHOUHAAN vs State (Bihar) — 20/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRIMINAL REVISION

CNR: BRBA010018532024

Filing Number

1853/2024

Filing Date

27-Apr-2024

Registration No

20/2024

Registration Date

27-Apr-2024

Court

DJ Div. Banka

Judge

2-District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

396

Police Station

Complaint Case

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJ KUMAR CHOUHAAN

    Adv. Anand deo Choudhary

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State (Bihar)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    ContestedView PDF

    The District & Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition challenging the trial court's bail order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court upheld the lower court's condition requiring 10% deposit of the cheque amount as interim compensation, finding it legally valid under Section 143(A) of the N.I. Act, since a prima facie case had been established against the accused with a claim amount of Rs. 10 lakh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  4. 29-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  5. 24-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  6. 04-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  7. 12-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  9. 13-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  10. 25-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  11. 09-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  12. 23-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  14. 28-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  15. 25-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  16. 14-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  17. 25-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  18. 03-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  19. 01-May-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  20. 20-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  21. 13-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  22. 04-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  23. 22-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  24. 25-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  25. 20-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  26. 20-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  27. 22-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  28. 31-May-2024

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-1st

  29. 08-May-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  30. 29-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 27-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition challenging the trial court's bail order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court upheld the lower court's condition requiring 10% deposit of the cheque amount as interim compensation, finding it legally valid under Section 143(A) of the N.I. Act, since a prima facie case had been established against the accused with a claim amount of Rs. 10 lakh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case