BIRJU MEHTAR vs ADO RANI DEVI — 102/2025
Case under Hindu Marriage Act Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th May 2026.
MATRIMONIAL CASE
CNR: BRBA010016442025
e-Filing Number
30-04-2025
Filing Number
187/2025
Filing Date
30-Apr-2025
Registration No
102/2025
Registration Date
30-Apr-2025
Court
DJ Div. Banka
Judge
16-Principal Judge, Family Court
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 17-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIRJU MEHTAR
Adv. Shreeniwas Sinha
Respondent(s)
-
1.ADO RANI DEVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
UncontestedView PDF
Case Summary The Family Court, Banka dismissed matrimonial case No. 102/2025 filed by Birju Mehtar under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for non-compliance of court orders. The court found that the petitioner failed to continuously attend proceedings since July 16, 2025, did not file requisite summons despite multiple opportunities, and showed no genuine interest in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
Disposed
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
11-Mar-2026
Appearence
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
30-Jan-2026
Appearence
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
26-Nov-2025
Appearence
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
16-Sep-2025
Appearence
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
16-Jul-2025
Appearence
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
17-Jun-2025
Appearence
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
09-May-2025
Appearence
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
02-May-2025
Report
Principal Judge, Family Court
-
01-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 102/2025
Case Summary The Family Court, Banka dismissed matrimonial case No. 102/2025 filed by Birju Mehtar under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for non-compliance of court orders. The court found that the petitioner failed to continuously attend proceedings since July 16, 2025, did not file requisite summons despite multiple opportunities, and showed no genuine interest in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts