SUFIYAN HUSSAIN vs State (Bihar) — 168/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),223. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

B.P. - Bail Petition

CNR: BRBA010011312026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

1031/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

168/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Banka

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

JAIPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),223
Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation ) Act Section 4(1),5(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUFIYAN HUSSAIN

    Adv. Ram Kishore Yadav

  2. 2.CHHOTU KUMAR

    Adv. Anand deo choudhary

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State (Bihar)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    ContestedView PDF

    The Sessions Judge granted bail to petitioners Sufiyan Hussain and Chhotu Kumar Das, who were arrested for illegal sand mining from Jhilsi Nadi Ghat and charged under BNS Sections 303(2), 317(2), 223 and mining-related statutes. The court found that since the petitioners had been in jail since 26.02.2026 and had already compensated the mining department (Rs. 1,35,313), continued detention served no purpose. They were released on bail of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 168/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge granted bail to petitioners Sufiyan Hussain and Chhotu Kumar Das, who were arrested for illegal sand mining from Jhilsi Nadi Ghat and charged under BNS Sections 303(2), 317(2), 223 and mining-related statutes. The court found that since the petitioners had been in jail since 26.02.2026 and had already compensated the mining department (Rs. 1,35,313), continued detention served no purpose. They were released on bail of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case