RAMPUKAR YADAV vs State (Bihar) — 165/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),109(1),303,351(2),316,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
B.P. - Bail Petition
CNR: BRBA010011252026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
1026/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
165/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Banka
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
19
Police Station
Bandhua Kurwa
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMPUKAR YADAV
Adv. Sri Akhilesh kumar singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State (Bihar)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
ContestedView PDF
Case Summary: Ram Pukar Yadav and Rinku Devi's bail petition was granted. Charged with assault with intent to kill, robbery, and related offenses, the Sessions Judge found that medical reports showed only simple injuries to non-vital body parts and characterized the matter as familial in nature. With no criminal antecedents and nearly two months in custody, the court ordered their release on bail of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 165/2026
Case Summary: Ram Pukar Yadav and Rinku Devi's bail petition was granted. Charged with assault with intent to kill, robbery, and related offenses, the Sessions Judge found that medical reports showed only simple injuries to non-vital body parts and characterized the matter as familial in nature. With no criminal antecedents and nearly two months in custody, the court ordered their release on bail of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts