RAMPUKAR MAHTO vs PRALAD PANJIYARA — 252/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,304(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

A. B. P. - Anticipatory Bail Application

CNR: BRBA010008472026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

776/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

252/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Banka

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

319

Police Station

Complaint Case

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,304(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMPUKAR MAHTO

    Adv. Vishw Bandhu Sant

  2. 2.GIRDHARI MAHTO

    Adv. Kumar Pritam

  3. 3.BIMLES KUMAR

    Adv. Kumar Pritam

  4. 4.GULSHAN KUMAR

    Adv. Kumar Pritam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRALAD PANJIYARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    ContestedView PDF

    The Sessions Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by four petitioners accused of assault, robbery, and causing death (Sections 352, 304(2), 3/5 BNS) based on a complaint that they attacked and robbed the complainant of groceries and a silver chain. The court held the petition unmaintainable because summons have merely been issued at the complaint stage, and the trial court will consider bail upon the accused's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 252/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by four petitioners accused of assault, robbery, and causing death (Sections 352, 304(2), 3/5 BNS) based on a complaint that they attacked and robbed the complainant of groceries and a silver chain. The court held the petition unmaintainable because summons have merely been issued at the complaint stage, and the trial court will consider bail upon the accused's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case