Md Morshid Khan vs Nitish kumar and others — 86/2020
Case under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2016 Section 30(a). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
Spl. case for Excise Act.
CNR: BRBA010008262020
Filing Number
691/2020
Filing Date
20-Feb-2020
Registration No
86/2020
Registration Date
20-Feb-2020
Court
DJ Div. Banka
Judge
19-Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
DHORAIYA
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Md Morshid Khan
Adv. Special p.p
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nitish kumar and others
-
2.rajendra prasad gupta
Case History
-
29-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
30-Jul-2025
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
18-Jan-2025
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
25-Nov-2024
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
04-Sep-2024
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
03-Aug-2024
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
02-Jul-2024
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
12-Jun-2024
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
13-May-2024
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
20-Apr-2024
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
21-Mar-2024
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
23-Jan-2024
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
08-Nov-2023
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
05-Aug-2023
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
03-Jul-2023
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
30-Jun-2023
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
25-Apr-2023
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
22-Feb-2023
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
06-Jan-2023
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
19-Nov-2022
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
20-Sep-2022
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
06-Aug-2022
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
16-Jul-2022
Evidence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
27-May-2022
Appearence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
08-Apr-2022
Appearence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
04-Feb-2022
Appearence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
31-Jan-2022
Appearence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
28-Sep-2021
Appearence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
23-Aug-2021
Appearence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
19-May-2021
Appearence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
02-Sep-2020
Appearence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
04-Jul-2020
Appearence
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
11-Apr-2020
Restored
Exclusive Special Court of Excise Act No. 1
-
16-Mar-2020
ContestedView PDF
Summary: Bail petition DENIED. Accused Nitish Kumar and Rajendra Pd. Gupta, arrested on 19.02.2020 for illegal liquor possession under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, were denied bail by the Additional District Judge-II, Banka on 16.03.2020. The court rejected the application considering the large quantity of illicit liquor seized (15.540 liters) despite the defense counsel's claim of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 86/2020
Summary: Bail petition DENIED. Accused Nitish Kumar and Rajendra Pd. Gupta, arrested on 19.02.2020 for illegal liquor possession under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, were denied bail by the Additional District Judge-II, Banka on 16.03.2020. The court rejected the application considering the large quantity of illicit liquor seized (15.540 liters) despite the defense counsel's claim of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts