JALIL vs STATE OF BIHAR — 100/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2)191(3),190(1)103(1),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 13th March 2026.
B.P. - Bail Petition
CNR: BRBA010007322026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
671/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
100/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Banka
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
68
Police Station
Suiya
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JALIL
Adv. Md Motallib Ansari
-
2.BAHADUR
Adv. Md Motallib Ansari
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
ContestedView PDF
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Banka dismissed the bail petition of Jalil Ansari and Bahadur Ansari, who are accused in a murder case arising from a land dispute. The court found this to be a serious "broad daylight murder" case still in its nascent investigative stage with no chargesheet filed, and determined that bail was not warranted at this stage despite the petitioners' arguments of no criminal antecedent and potential implication based on another accused's confessional statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 100/2026
Summary: The Sessions Judge, Banka dismissed the bail petition of Jalil Ansari and Bahadur Ansari, who are accused in a murder case arising from a land dispute. The court found this to be a serious "broad daylight murder" case still in its nascent investigative stage with no chargesheet filed, and determined that bail was not warranted at this stage despite the petitioners' arguments of no criminal antecedent and potential implication based on another accused's confessional statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts