Suresh Yadav vs Kailash yadav and others — 50/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,379,308,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRBA010005012018
Filing Number
421/2018
Filing Date
09-Feb-2018
Registration No
50/2018
Registration Date
09-Feb-2018
Court
DJ Div. Banka
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
55
Police Station
RAJOUN
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Suresh Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kailash yadav and others
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
ContestedView PDF
Case Summary: S.T. No. 50 of 2018 Court Decision: All four accused (Kailash Yadav, Atal Bihari Yadav, Rakesh Yadav, and Rabin Yadav) were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 308/34, 341/34, 323/34, and 504/34. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite charging for assault and theft allegedly occurring on 04.03.2016 over a broken hand-pump, the prosecution examined only one witness—the informant's interested son—and failed to produce the informant, investigating officer, or injury report evidence. The court found this insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
14-May-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Dec-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Nov-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Oct-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Jul-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Jun-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2024
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Dec-2023
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Nov-2023
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Sep-2023
Appearence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Jul-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-May-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Jan-2023
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Dec-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Nov-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Sep-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Aug-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Jul-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Jun-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Apr-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Mar-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Jan-2022
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Nov-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Sep-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Aug-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Jul-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Jun-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-May-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Apr-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jan-2021
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Dec-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Nov-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Sep-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Aug-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Jul-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Jul-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jun-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-May-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Mar-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2020
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Nov-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Nov-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Sep-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Aug-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jul-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Jun-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
01-May-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Jan-2019
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Nov-2018
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Jul-2018
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-May-2018
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 50/2018
Case Summary: S.T. No. 50 of 2018 Court Decision: All four accused (Kailash Yadav, Atal Bihari Yadav, Rakesh Yadav, and Rabin Yadav) were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 308/34, 341/34, 323/34, and 504/34. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite charging for assault and theft allegedly occurring on 04.03.2016 over a broken hand-pump, the prosecution examined only one witness—the informant's interested son—and failed to produce the informant, investigating officer, or injury report evidence. The court found this insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts