KANTA KUMARI vs SUBOD YADAV AND OTHERS — 2792/2015

Case under Criminal Prosudure Code Section 147/341/323/324/307/504IPC. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRBA010004092014

Filing Number

20374/2015

Filing Date

31-Jul-2014

Registration No

2792/2015

Registration Date

31-Jul-2014

Court

DJ Div. Banka

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

215

Police Station

FULI DUMAR

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Criminal Prosudure Code Section 147/341/323/324/307/504IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANTA KUMARI

    Adv. ARUN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBOD YADAV AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    ContestedView PDF

    Case Summary: 2792/2015 Court Decision: All six accused (Subodh Yadav, Ishwar Yadav, Rani Devi, Kumkum Kumari, Koyali Devi, and Rinku Devi) were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 147, 341/149, 323/149, 324/149, and 307/149. Key Reasoning: The Sessions Judge found the prosecution's case fundamentally weak. The only eyewitness (the informant, Kanta Kumari) admitted in cross-examination that she did not see who assaulted whom amid the crowd chaos. The other five prosecution witnesses were either the investigating officer (formal witness), non-eyewitnesses, or hearsay witnesses. Critically, the informant herself testified that the parties had compromised and there was no ongoing dispute. The prosecution also failed to formally prove injury reports. Given this lack of credible evidence establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt, the court acquitted all accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 29-May-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 21-May-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 06-May-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 13-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  10. 20-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  11. 12-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  12. 08-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  13. 28-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  14. 29-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  15. 16-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  16. 28-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  17. 06-Aug-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  18. 25-Jun-2025

    Appearence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  19. 08-May-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

  20. 18-Mar-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  21. 20-Feb-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  22. 21-Jan-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  23. 07-Jan-2025

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  24. 18-Dec-2024

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  25. 09-Dec-2024

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  26. 18-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  27. 29-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  28. 30-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  29. 12-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  30. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  31. 19-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  32. 15-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  33. 10-May-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  34. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  35. 05-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  36. 20-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  37. 29-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  38. 04-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV

  39. 04-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  40. 21-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  41. 06-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  42. 05-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  43. 01-May-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  44. 28-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  45. 07-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  46. 04-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  47. 28-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  48. 09-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  49. 05-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  50. 20-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  51. 15-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  52. 16-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  53. 22-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  54. 18-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  55. 21-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  56. 27-May-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  57. 16-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  58. 20-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  59. 29-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  60. 13-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  61. 09-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  62. 05-May-2021

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  63. 06-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-III

  64. 22-Dec-2020

    Evidence

  65. 04-Nov-2020

    Evidence

  66. 12-Aug-2020

    Evidence

  67. 09-Jun-2020

    Evidence

  68. 30-Apr-2020

    Evidence

  69. 17-Mar-2020

    Evidence

  70. 04-Feb-2020

    Evidence

  71. 06-Jan-2020

    Evidence

  72. 21-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Fast Track Court-II (Presently Vacant)

  73. 30-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    Fast Track Court-II (Presently Vacant)

  74. 19-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    Fast Track Court-II (Presently Vacant)

  75. 02-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    Fast Track Court-II (Presently Vacant)

  76. 08-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    Fast Track Court-II (Presently Vacant)

  77. 08-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  78. 01-Jun-2019

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  79. 30-Apr-2019

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  80. 23-Mar-2019

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  81. 14-Feb-2019

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  82. 07-Dec-2018

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  83. 26-Sep-2018

    Appearence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  84. 31-Jul-2018

    Appearence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  85. 07-Jun-2018

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  86. 19-Apr-2018

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  87. 28-Feb-2018

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  88. 09-Jan-2018

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  89. 18-Nov-2017

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  90. 13-Sep-2017

    Evidence

  91. 16-Aug-2017

    Evidence

  92. 20-Jul-2017

    Evidence

  93. 29-Jun-2017

    Evidence

    Adhoc_A.D.J. 1st

  94. 03-Jun-2017

    Evidence

    Adhoc_A.D.J. 1st

  95. 09-May-2017

    Evidence

    Adhoc_A.D.J. 1st

  96. 18-Apr-2017

    Evidence

    Adhoc_A.D.J. 1st

  97. 22-Mar-2017

    Evidence

    Adhoc_A.D.J. 1st

  98. 20-Feb-2017

    Evidence

    Adhoc_A.D.J. 1st

  99. 23-Jan-2017

    Evidence

    Adhoc_A.D.J. 1st

  100. 22-Dec-2016

    Evidence

    Adhoc_A.D.J. 1st

  101. 29-Nov-2016

    Evidence

    Adhoc_A.D.J. 1st

  102. 04-Nov-2016

    Evidence

    Adhoc_A.D.J. 1st

  103. 26-Sep-2016

    Evidence

    Adhoc_A.D.J. 1st

  104. 30-Aug-2016

    Evidence

    Adhoc_A.D.J. 1st

  105. 02-Aug-2016

    Evidence

    Adhoc_A.D.J. 1st

  106. 12-Jul-2016

    Evidence

    Adhoc_A.D.J. 1st

  107. 17-Jun-2016

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 6th

  108. 26-May-2016

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 6th

  109. 04-May-2016

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 6th

  110. 13-Apr-2016

    Evidence

    A.D.J. 6th

  111. 16-Mar-2016

    Evidence

  112. 16-Feb-2016

    Evidence

  113. 12-Jan-2016

    Evidence

  114. 05-Dec-2015

    Evidence

  115. 04-Nov-2015

    Evidence

  116. 22-Sep-2015

    Evidence

  117. 26-Aug-2015

    Evidence

  118. 29-Jul-2015

    Evidence

  119. 30-Jun-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  120. 31-Jul-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2792/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 2792/2015 Court Decision: All six accused (Subodh Yadav, Ishwar Yadav, Rani Devi, Kumkum Kumari, Koyali Devi, and Rinku Devi) were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 147, 341/149, 323/149, 324/149, and 307/149. Key Reasoning: The Sessions Judge found the prosecution's case fundamentally weak. The only eyewitness (the informant, Kanta Kumari) admitted in cross-examination that she did not see who assaulted whom amid the crowd chaos. The other five prosecution witnesses were either the investigating officer (formal witness), non-eyewitnesses, or hearsay witnesses. Critically, the informant herself testified that the parties had compromised and there was no ongoing dispute. The prosecution also failed to formally prove injury reports. Given this lack of credible evidence establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt, the court acquitted all accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case