BINIOD KUMAR THAKUR vs State (Bihar) — 46/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.
A. B. P. - Anticipatory Bail Application
CNR: BRBA010001852026
e-Filing Number
09-01-2026
Filing Number
166/2026
Filing Date
09-Jan-2026
Registration No
46/2026
Registration Date
09-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Banka
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
591
Police Station
Complaint Case
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BINIOD KUMAR THAKUR
Adv. Shankar Thakur
-
2.SURESH KUMAR THAKUR
Adv. Shankar Thakur
Respondent(s)
-
1.State (Bihar)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Contested
The Sessions Judge, Banka dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Binod Kumar Thakur and Suresh Kumar Thakur in a cheque bouncing case under Section 420 IPC. The court found that the accused had evaded court process since 2023 and only approached for bail after Section 82 CrPC process was issued, and they failed to implead the complainant as a party to the petition, making it procedurally defective. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 46/2026
The Sessions Judge, Banka dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Binod Kumar Thakur and Suresh Kumar Thakur in a cheque bouncing case under Section 420 IPC. The court found that the accused had evaded court process since 2023 and only approached for bail after Section 82 CrPC process was issued, and they failed to implead the complainant as a party to the petition, making it procedurally defective. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts