NEHA PANJIKAR vs State (Bihar) — 41/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.
A. B. P. - Anticipatory Bail Application
CNR: BRBA010001622026
e-Filing Number
08-01-2026
Filing Number
146/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
41/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Banka
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
334
Police Station
SHAMBHUGANJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NEHA PANJIKAR
Adv. Sri Manoj Kumar
-
2.AADARSHA PRATAB
Adv. SANJAY KANT DUBEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.State (Bihar)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
ContestedView PDF
Summary The Sessions Judge, Banka dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Neha Panjikar and Aadarsh Pratap, who were accused under Section 108, 3/5 of BNSS in connection with the death of Anuj Panjikar. The court found serious allegations against the petitioners and noted that the medical opinion on the cause of death was pending; since the investigation was at a nascent stage, the court deemed it inappropriate to grant pre-arrest bail at that juncture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 41/2026
Summary The Sessions Judge, Banka dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Neha Panjikar and Aadarsh Pratap, who were accused under Section 108, 3/5 of BNSS in connection with the death of Anuj Panjikar. The court found serious allegations against the petitioners and noted that the medical opinion on the cause of death was pending; since the investigation was at a nascent stage, the court deemed it inappropriate to grant pre-arrest bail at that juncture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts