VIKASH YADAV vs STATE OF BIHAR — 3/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,315.307,354,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.
A. B. P. - Anticipatory Bail Application
CNR: BRBA010000042026
e-Filing Number
02-01-2026
Filing Number
3/2026
Filing Date
02-Jan-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
02-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Banka
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
126
Police Station
SHAMBHUGANJ
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIKASH YADAV
Adv. Rajesh Kumar
-
2.KUNDAN YADAV
Adv. Rajesh Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
ContestedView PDF
Case Summary: The Sessions Judge, Banka dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Vikash Yadav and Kundan Yadav in a case involving alleged attack on Arun Kumar and others on 06.06.2021 using deadly weapons, resulting in head injuries and fractures. The court rejected the petitioners' argument that they were omitted from the charge-sheet, finding the injury reports and prosecution allegations sufficient to deny pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2026
Case Summary: The Sessions Judge, Banka dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by Vikash Yadav and Kundan Yadav in a case involving alleged attack on Arun Kumar and others on 06.06.2021 using deadly weapons, resulting in head injuries and fractures. The court rejected the petitioners' argument that they were omitted from the charge-sheet, finding the injury reports and prosecution allegations sufficient to deny pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts