sadanand paswan vs deepak — 365/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,341,323,307,379,504,506,448. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
G R FILE - GOVERNMENT REGISTERED
CNR: BRAU110004462021
Next Hearing
20th July 2026
Filing Number
445/2021
Filing Date
31-05-2021
Registration No
365/2021
Registration Date
31-05-2021
Court
CJM Div. Daudnagar
Judge
1-SDJM cum Judge-in-charge
FIR Details
FIR Number
235
Police Station
DAUD NAGAR
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
sadanand paswan
Adv. state
Respondent(s)
deepak
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SDJM cum Judge-in-charge
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 365/2021 - Sadanand Paswan v. Deepak Outcome: Bail petition DISMISSED/REJECTED Sunil Paswan (imprisoned since 07-06-2021) sought bail in connection with FIR No. 235/2021 under IPC sections 147, 241, 323, 307, 379, 504, and 448. The court found credible evidence that on 27-04-2021, Sunil Paswan along with co-accused (including Deepak Paswan and Surendra Paswan) attacked the complainant with weapons (lathis and iron rods), causing serious injuries including head wounds and a dislocated shoulder. A gold chain was also stolen. Considering the gravity of the offenses and circumstances, the court rejected the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 365/2021 - Sadanand Paswan v. Deepak Outcome: Bail petition DISMISSED/REJECTED Sunil Paswan (imprisoned since 07-06-2021) sought bail in connection with FIR No. 235/2021 under IPC sections 147, 241, 323, 307, 379, 504, and 448. The court found credible evidence that on 27-04-2021, Sunil Paswan along with co-accused (including Deepak Paswan and Surendra Paswan) attacked the complainant with weapons (lathis and iron rods), causing serious injuries including head wounds and a dislocated shoulder. A gold chain was also stolen. Considering the gravity of the offenses and circumstances, the court rejected the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts