Md Raja Khan vs State of Bihar — 2761/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010152032025
e-Filing Number
23-12-2025
Filing Number
13711/2025
Filing Date
23-Dec-2025
Registration No
2761/2025
Registration Date
23-Dec-2025
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
4-District Addl. S J- IV
Decision Date
25-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
47
Police Station
Salaiya
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Md Raja Khan
Adv. Imteyaz Ansari
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Apr-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Md. Raja Khan, accused under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights of Marriage) Act for subjecting his wife to physical and mental cruelty, dowry demands, and pronouncing triple talaq. The court found the allegations serious and the petitioner's duty to care for his wife had failed, rendering him unsuitable for bail despite his claim that the charges were false and instigated by family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Addl. S J- IV
-
21-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
14-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J- IV
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2761/2025
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Md. Raja Khan, accused under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights of Marriage) Act for subjecting his wife to physical and mental cruelty, dowry demands, and pronouncing triple talaq. The court found the allegations serious and the petitioner's duty to care for his wife had failed, rendering him unsuitable for bail despite his claim that the charges were false and instigated by family members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts