STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRAYAG PASWAN vs BABAN SINGH — 143/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 504,506,34,341,323,307,298. Disposed: Uncontested--Final Form Accepted on 10th March 2026.

SPECIAL CASE (SC-ST Act) - Harizan Atrocities Act

CNR: BRAU010147222024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

14605/2024

Filing Date

19-12-2024

Registration No

143/2024

Registration Date

19-12-2024

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Final Form Accepted

FIR Details

FIR Number

0014

Police Station

SC/ST

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 504,506,34,341,323,307,298
Prevention of Atrocities (S.C/S.T Act ) Section 3(1)(k),3(2)(va),3(1)(i),3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(1)(t)

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRAYAG PASWAN

Adv. Shakti Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

BABAN SINGH

JAINATH SINGH

Adv. null

CHANDAN SINGH

Adv. null

ANIL SINGH

Adv. null

BALDEV SINGH

Adv. null

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

10-03-2026

Disposed

22-12-2025

Appearence

26-09-2025

Appearence

02-07-2025

Appearence

01-05-2025

Appearence

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
First Order

The Special Judge SC/ST (POA) Act Court in Aurangabad, Bihar accepted the final report submitted by the investigator on 30.10.2023 declaring the incident as false in FIR No. 14/2023 under the SC/ST Atrocities Prevention Act. The court dismissed the case due to the informant's repeated absence and lack of interest, noting that no private interest existed in the matter, and directed the office to file necessary records with the archives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge SC/ST (POA) Act Court in Aurangabad, Bihar accepted the final report submitted by the investigator on 30.10.2023 declaring the incident as false in FIR No. 14/2023 under the SC/ST Atrocities Prevention Act. The court dismissed the case due to the informant's repeated absence and lack of interest, noting that no private interest existed in the matter, and directed the office to file necessary records with the archives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Division Aurangabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case