State of Bihar through Dudheshwar Ram vs Jayprakash kumar — 226/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 31, 323, 427, 436, 448, 504, 506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.
SPECIAL CASE (SC-ST Act) - Harizan Atrocities Act
CNR: BRAU010129062025
Filing Number
11607/2025
Filing Date
03-11-2025
Registration No
226/2025
Registration Date
03-11-2025
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
308
Police Station
DEO
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Bihar through Dudheshwar Ram
Adv. Shakti Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
Jayprakash kumar
Sanoj kumar Yadav
Nand Kishor Yadav
Kameshwar Yadav
Anoj kumar
Om Prakash kumar
Manoj kumar
Alok kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Disposed
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. |
| 09-03-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. |
| 27-02-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District & Additional Sessions Judge acquitted all seven accused persons (Jaiprakash Kumar, Om Prakash Kumar, Manoj Yadav, Sanoj Kumar, Anoj Kumar, Alok Kumar, and Janesgwar Yadav) of charges under IPC sections 341/34, 323/34, 427/34, 436/34, 448/34, 506/34 and SC/ST Act provisions, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The informant retracted his accusations during cross-examination, admitting it was dark during the incident and he saw no one set the fire, while other prosecution witnesses were declared hostile and provided no corroborating evidence, resulting in the court determining the evidence was "pathetically insufficient." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District & Additional Sessions Judge acquitted all seven accused persons (Jaiprakash Kumar, Om Prakash Kumar, Manoj Yadav, Sanoj Kumar, Anoj Kumar, Alok Kumar, and Janesgwar Yadav) of charges under IPC sections 341/34, 323/34, 427/34, 436/34, 448/34, 506/34 and SC/ST Act provisions, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The informant retracted his accusations during cross-examination, admitting it was dark during the incident and he saw no one set the fire, while other prosecution witnesses were declared hostile and provided no corroborating evidence, resulting in the court determining the evidence was "pathetically insufficient." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts