Meera Kumar Paswan vs Awadhesh Sharma — 312/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504,506,448,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRAU010057502016
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
312/2016
Filing Date
01-03-2021
Registration No
312/2016
Registration Date
01-03-2021
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
51
Police Station
NTPC Khaira
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Meera Kumar Paswan
Respondent(s)
Awadhesh Sharma
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Disposed
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. | |
| 10-03-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. | |
| 02-02-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. | |
| 17-01-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District and Sessions Court (SC/ST Special Judge), Aurangabad, Bihar acquitted three accused persons—Avdhesh Sharma, Bheem Sharma, and Bablu Sharma—on April 7, 2026, of charges under IPC Sections 341/34, 323/34, 504/34, 506/34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the prosecution failed to establish the accused's involvement through credible witness testimony, as the main witness (the complainant) recanted his allegations during cross-examination, stating reconciliation had occurred between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The District and Sessions Court (SC/ST Special Judge), Aurangabad, Bihar acquitted three accused persons—Avdhesh Sharma, Bheem Sharma, and Bablu Sharma—on April 7, 2026, of charges under IPC Sections 341/34, 323/34, 504/34, 506/34 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the prosecution failed to establish the accused's involvement through credible witness testimony, as the main witness (the complainant) recanted his allegations during cross-examination, stating reconciliation had occurred between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts