Vyash Ram vs Nagendra Kumar Singh — 126/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,504,379,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.
SPECIAL CASE (SC-ST Act) - Harizan Atrocities Act
CNR: BRAU010044862021
Filing Number
3892/2021
Filing Date
15-Sep-2021
Registration No
126/2021
Registration Date
15-Sep-2021
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
SC/ST
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vyash Ram
Adv. pp
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nagendra Kumar Singh
-
2.Kaushal Kumar Singh @ Pintu Kumar Singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge in Aurangabad, Bihar acquitted both accused persons—Nagendra Kumar Singh and Kaushan Kumar Singh @ Pintu Kumar Singh—of charges under IPC sections 341/34, 323/34, 506/34 and SC/ST Act sections 3(i)(s), 3(2)(va). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness (informant Vyas Ram) retracted his allegations during cross-examination, stating the parties had settled the matter voluntarily and none were insulted on caste grounds. With insufficient and pathetically weak prosecution evidence, the accused were granted the benefit of doubt and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
12-Mar-2026
Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence
-
13-May-2025
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
05-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
21-Oct-2024
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
05-Aug-2024
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
01-Jun-2024
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
28-Mar-2024
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
15-Jan-2024
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
05-Jan-2024
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
19-Oct-2023
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
04-Aug-2023
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
05-Jun-2023
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
18-May-2023
Evidence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
17-Mar-2023
Charge
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
23-Dec-2022
Appearence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
21-Oct-2022
Appearence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
16-Aug-2022
Appearence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
22-Jun-2022
Appearence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
28-Apr-2022
Appearence
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
04-Mar-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
17-Jan-2022
Awated for final form / Chargesheet
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
22-Nov-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Sep-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 126/2021
Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge in Aurangabad, Bihar acquitted both accused persons—Nagendra Kumar Singh and Kaushan Kumar Singh @ Pintu Kumar Singh—of charges under IPC sections 341/34, 323/34, 506/34 and SC/ST Act sections 3(i)(s), 3(2)(va). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness (informant Vyas Ram) retracted his allegations during cross-examination, stating the parties had settled the matter voluntarily and none were insulted on caste grounds. With insufficient and pathetically weak prosecution evidence, the accused were granted the benefit of doubt and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts