Bharat Tiwari vs State of Bihar — 336/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRAU010035812026

e-Filing Number

19-03-2026

Filing Number

3267/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

336/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

92

Police Station

BARUN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bharat Tiwari

    Adv. Abhay prasad

  2. 2.Shankar Tiwari

    Adv. Abhay prasad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: B.P. No. 346/2026 The Sessions Judge granted bail to petitioner Bhim Paswan, who was accused of wrongful entry, assault, and theft (Rs. 50,000, gold chain, and earrings). The court found that Paswan had been in judicial custody for over one month with no criminal antecedent, the injury assessment remained inconclusive, and the FIR appeared to be a counter-case. He was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 336/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.P. No. 346/2026 The Sessions Judge granted bail to petitioner Bhim Paswan, who was accused of wrongful entry, assault, and theft (Rs. 50,000, gold chain, and earrings). The court found that Paswan had been in judicial custody for over one month with no criminal antecedent, the injury assessment remained inconclusive, and the FIR appeared to be a counter-case. He was released on Rs. 10,000 bail with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case