Krishna Prajapati vs State of Bihar — 611/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010032312026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
2946/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
611/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
5
Police Station
NABINAGAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Krishna Prajapati
Adv. Kamakhaya Narayan Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Apr-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 611/2026: The Sessions Judge rejected Krishna Prajapati's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving assault charges under BNS 2023. The court found specific allegations that Prajapati assaulted two sons of the informant with an iron pipe, causing head injuries; one victim (Varun Kumar) died during treatment. Despite Prajapati's claims of false implication, the court emphasized the serious nature of the charges and the victim's death, rendering him ineligible for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 611/2026
Summary of Case 611/2026: The Sessions Judge rejected Krishna Prajapati's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving assault charges under BNS 2023. The court found specific allegations that Prajapati assaulted two sons of the informant with an iron pipe, causing head injuries; one victim (Varun Kumar) died during treatment. Despite Prajapati's claims of false implication, the court emphasized the serious nature of the charges and the victim's death, rendering him ineligible for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts