Ashok Saw vs State of Bihar — 300/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRAU010032302026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
2945/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
300/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
MADANPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashok Saw
Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH I
Sudama Sao
Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH I
Saurav Kumar
Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH I
Krish Kumar
Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH I
Gautam Kumar
Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH I
Gaurav Kumar
Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH I
Rubi Devi
Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH I
Manju Devi
Adv. RAJKUMAR SINGH I
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: B.P No.300/2026 The court granted bail to three of the petitioners (Ashok Saw, Sudama Saw, and Saurav Kumar) who were in judicial custody since February 11, 2026, for alleged assault charges under BNS 2023. The judge found no specific allegations against the petitioners, noted their clean criminal records, and considered the existence of a counter-case filed by the petitioners against the informant, along with one month of custody already served. Bail was approved on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: B.P No.300/2026 The court granted bail to three of the petitioners (Ashok Saw, Sudama Saw, and Saurav Kumar) who were in judicial custody since February 11, 2026, for alleged assault charges under BNS 2023. The judge found no specific allegations against the petitioners, noted their clean criminal records, and considered the existence of a counter-case filed by the petitioners against the informant, along with one month of custody already served. Bail was approved on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts