Sanjay Rajak vs State of Bihar — 297/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRAU010032252026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

2940/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

297/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

106

Police Station

AURANGABAD TOWN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Rajak

    Adv. sujeet kumar singh

  2. 2.Golu Kumar

    Adv. sujeet kumar singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 297/2026 The court granted bail to Sanjay Rajak (husband) and Golu Kumar (son) who were charged with domestic violence offenses under BNS 2023 sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), and 109(1)/3(5) for allegedly assaulting the informant, causing her head injury. The judge allowed the bail petition considering the matter was a family dispute and the informant herself appeared in court expressing willingness to compromise; she specifically stated her son had not caused her injury. The petitioners were released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 297/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 297/2026 The court granted bail to Sanjay Rajak (husband) and Golu Kumar (son) who were charged with domestic violence offenses under BNS 2023 sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), and 109(1)/3(5) for allegedly assaulting the informant, causing her head injury. The judge allowed the bail petition considering the matter was a family dispute and the informant herself appeared in court expressing willingness to compromise; she specifically stated her son had not caused her injury. The petitioners were released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case