Dhananjay Paswan vs State of Bihar — 610/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRAU010032242026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
2939/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
610/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
13
Police Station
UPHARA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhananjay Paswan
Adv. Ashok kumar gupta
Om Prakash Paswan
Adv. Ashok kumar gupta
Lalita Devi
Adv. Ashok kumar gupta
Sanjay Paswan
Adv. Ashok kumar gupta
Bisan Kumar
Adv. Ashok kumar gupta
Uday Shankar Paswan
Adv. Ashok kumar gupta
Teja Devi
Adv. Ashok kumar gupta
Sudhir Kumar
Adv. Ashok kumar gupta
Satish Kumar
Adv. Ashok kumar gupta
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 26-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 610/2026 - Sessions Court, Aurangabad (Bihar) The court GRANTED anticipatory bail to nine petitioners (Dhananjay Paswan, Om Prakash Paswan, Lalita Devi, and six others) charged with outraging modesty, causing injury, and theft under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The Sessions Judge found the case was a retaliatory counter-complaint arising from an earlier incident (Case 03/2026) filed by the petitioners, noted the petitioners had no criminal antecedents, observed that only three accused had specific allegations while six had none, and criticized the delayed FIR filing without reasonable explanation. The court released them on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 610/2026 - Sessions Court, Aurangabad (Bihar) The court GRANTED anticipatory bail to nine petitioners (Dhananjay Paswan, Om Prakash Paswan, Lalita Devi, and six others) charged with outraging modesty, causing injury, and theft under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The Sessions Judge found the case was a retaliatory counter-complaint arising from an earlier incident (Case 03/2026) filed by the petitioners, noted the petitioners had no criminal antecedents, observed that only three accused had specific allegations while six had none, and criticized the delayed FIR filing without reasonable explanation. The court released them on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts