Dhananjay Paswan vs State of Bihar — 610/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010032242026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

2939/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

610/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

13

Police Station

UPHARA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dhananjay Paswan

    Adv. Ashok kumar gupta

  2. 2.Om Prakash Paswan

    Adv. Ashok kumar gupta

  3. 3.Lalita Devi

    Adv. Ashok kumar gupta

  4. 4.Sanjay Paswan

    Adv. Ashok kumar gupta

  5. 5.Bisan Kumar

    Adv. Ashok kumar gupta

  6. 6.Uday Shankar Paswan

    Adv. Ashok kumar gupta

  7. 7.Teja Devi

    Adv. Ashok kumar gupta

  8. 8.Sudhir Kumar

    Adv. Ashok kumar gupta

  9. 9.Satish Kumar

    Adv. Ashok kumar gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 610/2026 - Sessions Court, Aurangabad (Bihar) The court GRANTED anticipatory bail to nine petitioners (Dhananjay Paswan, Om Prakash Paswan, Lalita Devi, and six others) charged with outraging modesty, causing injury, and theft under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The Sessions Judge found the case was a retaliatory counter-complaint arising from an earlier incident (Case 03/2026) filed by the petitioners, noted the petitioners had no criminal antecedents, observed that only three accused had specific allegations while six had none, and criticized the delayed FIR filing without reasonable explanation. The court released them on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 610/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 610/2026 - Sessions Court, Aurangabad (Bihar) The court GRANTED anticipatory bail to nine petitioners (Dhananjay Paswan, Om Prakash Paswan, Lalita Devi, and six others) charged with outraging modesty, causing injury, and theft under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2), and 3(5). The Sessions Judge found the case was a retaliatory counter-complaint arising from an earlier incident (Case 03/2026) filed by the petitioners, noted the petitioners had no criminal antecedents, observed that only three accused had specific allegations while six had none, and criticized the delayed FIR filing without reasonable explanation. The court released them on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case