Md Isteyak Farhan vs State of Bihar — 607/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010032052026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

2923/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

607/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

56

Police Station

RAFIGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Md Isteyak Farhan

    Adv. Prabhat Kumar Verma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case 607/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to Md Isteyak Farhan, who was accused of unofficially entering a Panchayat Samiti meeting, misbehaving, and attempting to snatch a register from an officer. The Sessions Judge found no serious allegations of violence or injury and noted the petitioner's clean criminal record, making him eligible for bail. He was ordered released on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 607/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 607/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to Md Isteyak Farhan, who was accused of unofficially entering a Panchayat Samiti meeting, misbehaving, and attempting to snatch a register from an officer. The Sessions Judge found no serious allegations of violence or injury and noted the petitioner's clean criminal record, making him eligible for bail. He was ordered released on a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case