Md Arif Raza vs State of Bihar — 286/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRAU010030662026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
2804/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
286/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
TANDWA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Md Arif Raza
Adv. Md Merajussalam
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The District and Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad (Bihar) rejected the bail application of Md. Arif Raza, who was accused of blackmailing and extorting money from the informant's daughter through Instagram and WhatsApp, threatening to make intimate videos viral. The court found the allegations serious and of social menace, noting that investigation records and witness statements supported the prosecution's case, and held that the investigation was still at a nascent stage. The accused may renew his bail plea after charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 286/2026
Court Decision Summary The District and Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad (Bihar) rejected the bail application of Md. Arif Raza, who was accused of blackmailing and extorting money from the informant's daughter through Instagram and WhatsApp, threatening to make intimate videos viral. The court found the allegations serious and of social menace, noting that investigation records and witness statements supported the prosecution's case, and held that the investigation was still at a nascent stage. The accused may renew his bail plea after charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts