Manish Kumar Alias Manish Yadav vs State of Bihar — 591/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010030572026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

2799/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

591/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

68

Police Station

MADANPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manish Kumar Alias Manish Yadav

    Adv. Manoj Kumar singh I

  2. 2.Omprakash Kumar Alias OmPrakash Yadav

    Adv. Manoj Kumar singh I

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners accused of assault and criminal intimidation. The court found the allegations against them to be general and omnibus in nature, noted that injuries were simple, one petitioner had no criminal antecedent (the other's prior case was from juvenile period), and a counter-FIR existed. Each petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District And Sessions Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 591/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners accused of assault and criminal intimidation. The court found the allegations against them to be general and omnibus in nature, noted that injuries were simple, one petitioner had no criminal antecedent (the other's prior case was from juvenile period), and a counter-FIR existed. Each petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case