Chhotu Alias Rahul Kumar vs State of Bihar — 589/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRAU010030542026

HEARING

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

2797/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

589/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

DJ Division Aurangabad

Judge

3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

FIR Details

FIR Number

05

Police Station

AURANGABAD TOWN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Chhotu Alias Rahul Kumar

Adv. Ashok kumar gupta

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS

18-05-2026

HEARING

02-05-2026

HEARING

24-04-2026

HEARING

24-04-2026

Restored

24-04-2026

Disposed

Interim Orders

24-04-2026
Bail Order

Summary: The court granted provisional anticipatory bail to the 14-year-old accused petitioner upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each, valid from 24.04.2026 to 30.04.2026, with directions to surrender on 01.05.2026 for merit hearing. The court found the victim was 34 years old and the accused a juvenile, noting the victim's own statement that nothing occurred and a compromise petition was filed; additionally, the court directed the police to register an FIR under POCSO Act provisions, observing that if a major victim consented to physical relations with a minor, the victim herself may have committed an offense under POCSO. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted provisional anticipatory bail to the 14-year-old accused petitioner upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each, valid from 24.04.2026 to 30.04.2026, with directions to surrender on 01.05.2026 for merit hearing. The court found the victim was 34 years old and the accused a juvenile, noting the victim's own statement that nothing occurred and a compromise petition was filed; additionally, the court directed the police to register an FIR under POCSO Act provisions, observing that if a major victim consented to physical relations with a minor, the victim herself may have committed an offense under POCSO. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Division Aurangabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case