Raushan Kumar vs State of Bihar — 285/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRAU010030532026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
2796/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
285/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
19
Police Station
GOH
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raushan Kumar
Adv. ABHIJEET KUMAR
-
2.Subham Kumar
Adv. ABHIJEET KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Aurangabad granted bail to two petitioners (Raushan Kumar and Subham Kumar) accused of assault under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that there were no specific allegations against the petitioners, all injuries were simple in nature, they had no criminal antecedents, and they had already spent two months in judicial custody. The bail was granted on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 285/2026
Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Aurangabad granted bail to two petitioners (Raushan Kumar and Subham Kumar) accused of assault under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that there were no specific allegations against the petitioners, all injuries were simple in nature, they had no criminal antecedents, and they had already spent two months in judicial custody. The bail was granted on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts