Rahul Kumar alias Rahul Kumar Saw vs State of Bihar — 283/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRAU010030492026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
2792/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
283/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
529
Police Station
RAFIGANJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rahul Kumar alias Rahul Kumar Saw
Adv. Baliram Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Aurangabad granted bail to Rahul Kumar, accused of tractor theft under BNS Section 303(2). The court found that the stolen tractor had been recovered, the charge-sheet was already filed with cognizance taken, no proper grounds justified the arrest, and the petitioner had languished in custody for two months without compelling reasons to detain him. The court ordered bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, applying the principle that "bail is the rule and jail is the exception." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 283/2026
Case Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Aurangabad granted bail to Rahul Kumar, accused of tractor theft under BNS Section 303(2). The court found that the stolen tractor had been recovered, the charge-sheet was already filed with cognizance taken, no proper grounds justified the arrest, and the petitioner had languished in custody for two months without compelling reasons to detain him. The court ordered bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, applying the principle that "bail is the rule and jail is the exception." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts