Prince Kumar vs State of Bihar — 4/2026
Case under Juvenile Justice Act Section 101. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.
Cri.Apl juvenile - Cri.Appeal juvenile
CNR: BRAU010029902026
Filing Number
2737/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Division Aurangabad
Judge
3-District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
178
Police Station
MALI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Prince Kumar
Adv. Raju Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
JudgmentView PDF
The District and Additional Sessions Judge set aside the Juvenile Justice Board's order denying bail to a 16-year-old child in conflict with law accused under Section 69 BNS (sexual abuse allegation). The court held that under the Juvenile Justice Act 2015, bail is a rule and can only be denied on three specific grounds—association with criminals, moral/physical danger, or defeating justice—and found none were established since observations about "bad company" lacked documentary support. The juvenile was granted bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with conditions including monthly probation officer reporting and family care undertaking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
04-Apr-2026
Order
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Addl. S J-I-cum special judge SC/ST and NDPS
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2026
The District and Additional Sessions Judge set aside the Juvenile Justice Board's order denying bail to a 16-year-old child in conflict with law accused under Section 69 BNS (sexual abuse allegation). The court held that under the Juvenile Justice Act 2015, bail is a rule and can only be denied on three specific grounds—association with criminals, moral/physical danger, or defeating justice—and found none were established since observations about "bad company" lacked documentary support. The juvenile was granted bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with conditions including monthly probation officer reporting and family care undertaking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts